Category Archives: Community

Amrita Iyer Winter 2022 Scientist of the Month

Fall 2022 SOTM: Amrita Iyer, PhD

by J. K. Wenderott

It is clear while interviewing Dr. Amrita A. Iyer that communicating is one of her passions. She exudes excitement as she discusses her job as a science writer at Tempus Labs in Chicago, IL, as well as her path to choosing a career in science communication. “In my job, I get to drive [scientific] papers forward so that they do see light and get published. That is the most satisfying part of my job.”

Amrita grew up in India and attended Vellore Institute of Technology for her Bachelors in Biotechnology and the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras for her Masters in Biological Sciences. During this time, she became well acquainted with genetics research, and continuing on this path, she joined Baylor College of Medicine for her PhD in Molecular & Human Genetics. It was while she was a PhD student, though, that she started to explore other interests. “Once I was done with my qualifying exams and those formalities, I started doing science communication as a stress-beating strategy,” she explains. Her PhD research was in a niche area – genetics of the inner ear – and being able to discuss it in more general terms with an audience and teach them something they did not previously know was exciting. “The response I was getting when people understood something new, that response made me feel good about my research.” This perspective-building (that can often be lost when being too close to a research topic), as well as the opportunities to speak at workshops and other events that started to snowball, pushed Amrita to seriously consider a career path in science communication. In 2021, when presented with the fork between continuing research and transitioning to a career in science communication, Amrita “took a leap of faith” and joined Tempus Labs as a science writer, which she considers now to be “one of the best decisions” she has made for herself.  

Tempus Labs applies data and artificial intelligence to solve healthcare challenges for patients,  and Amrita’s job as a science writer there consists of many roles. Beyond interfacing with marketing, medical affairs, and sales teams, she prepares, edits and reviews research communications including abstracts for conferences and manuscripts for publication. She is quick to note a key difference between her job now and her time as a graduate student: while she was working on one or two manuscripts or abstracts as a graduate student at the same time, now she handles more like eight abstracts and three manuscripts simultaneously. “There’s a lot of project management, as well, because each project is at a different stage,” she explains. Amrita believes the base skills required for her job – writing, editing, project management, organization, asking questions of researchers – were honed naturally during her time as a PhD student. When thinking about career advancement, Amrita brings up seeking out certifications through organizations like the American Medical Writers Association (AMWA), International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP), and Board of Editors in the Life Sciences (BELS).

For those considering science writing, Amrita has several pieces of advice. For those in the early stages of their PhD, she recommends starting to build a portfolio as soon as possible by pursuing avenues to enhance your CV like serving as a teaching assistant for a medical writing class, checking LinkedIn for volunteer opportunities, and reviewing papers. Besides also seeking out these opportunities, those later on in their PhD can target certain certifications and credentials; for instance, BELS accepts PhD work as relevant experience, so students can apply and take the certification exam immediately. She also notes there are a variety of career branches in science communication. Within the industry, there are opportunities to work primarily on scientific publications, medical writing catered to pharmaceutical businesses, and regulatory writing. Other paths outside of industry can be found at non-profits, in academia as a grant writer, or through freelance work on a project-by-project basis.

Outside of her job, Amrita has many hobbies and interests like gardening, cooking, and writing fiction. Additionally, she has served in several mentorship capacities, including as a mentor for the AWIS-CAC Mentoring Circles program which consists of small intimate groups that meet over the summer to discuss mutual topics of interest. Speaking of her roles as a mentor and mentee, Amrita says, “It goes both ways. I learn a lot when I mentor. Mentees have so much to offer from the perspective of where they come from, what their background is, the way they ask questions, the way they understand things.” Her willingness to be a mentor is apparent beyond her commitment to these formal programs. She emphasized she is more than happy to hear from folks that have interest in science writing, would like her to review their resumes, or simply want to connect. You can reach Dr. Amrita A. Iyer by LinkedIn message.

Summer 2022 SOTM: Lisa Utschig, PhD

By: Nora Grasse

Dr. Lisa Utschig balances being an award-winning chemist and a mom. She is the Lead Principal Investigator of Natural Photosynthesis at Argonne National Lab with the Solar Energy Conversion Group. Dr. Utschig has defined her own path and stayed true to herself as she has brought novel bioinorganic chemistry approaches to the long-established field of photosynthesis research while being the mother of three.

Growing up, Dr. Utschig’s favorite subjects were art and math, so she decided to attend a small liberal arts school in Iowa, Cornell College, to explore her interests. She started classes thinking she might go to medical school and be a doctor. “I didn’t even know what graduate school was at that point or anything, coming from where I grew up,” she recalled. Her advisor at Cornell College was a chemist, who recommended exploring chemistry and encouraged her to try summer research at University of Iowa. Once she had her own research project outside of a classroom setting, she started to enjoy lab work. From there, Utschig applied to graduate school and attended Northwestern University for her PhD in Chemistry. Her focus was bioinorganic chemistry, specifically metalloregulatory proteins. She studied the effect of mercury on gene response.

After graduate school, the balance between work and family life started to help shape her career. Looking for a postdoctoral research position that could also be near her husband’s work, Utschig presented a poster at an Argonne National Laboratory event for women in science. There, she met Dr. Marion Thurnauer, who offered her a postdoc position in photosynthesis research. Thurnauer would go on to become her mentor at Argonne. Thurnauer advocated for Utschig so she could work part time, as Utschig wanted flexible hours to find her best balance of work and family life. Before starting her postdoc, Utschig envisioned herself becoming a professor at a liberal arts college like the one she attended, but her career goals changed as her love of research grew at Argonne.

Switching from her work on metalloregulatory proteins to photosynthesis was a big transition at first. “I used to joke that I didn’t even know what a chlorophyll was.” Photosynthesis research is a huge field with a rich history. “Interestingly enough, the differences in the fields led to my first discovery as a postdoc.” While studying the structure of photosynthetic reaction center proteins, which convert light to chemical energy, she discovered a zinc site on the protein that regulates an important electron transfer process. She elaborated, saying, “Other groups around the world picked up on that and actually proved that where the zinc binds is the entry point of the proton.” Coming from the fresh perspective of bioinorganic chemistry enabled her to make a new contribution to the photosynthetic research field. A key takeaway from this experience was to trust your instincts. After seeing something small and unexpected, she pursued it and asked more questions.

Some of her more recent work involves modifying photosynthetic proteins for hydrogen fuel production. Plants convert sunlight to chemical energy at near unity conversion; no artificial system comes close to this efficiency. “Part of my research is understanding how nature does it.” How do photosynthetic proteins capture the light energy? How can we use the light capture and conversion capability of nature to make solar fuel? Currently, Utschig is studying the production of clean hydrogen from sunlight and water. Her group has coupled synthetic chemistries and natural capture and conversion capabilities, adding a catalytic component to photosynthetic proteins. In 2020, Utschig won University of Chicago’s Distinguished Performance Award for her hydrogen research. Future direction for her work includes carbon dioxide research. She continues to bring an inspired approach to photosynthesis research through her bioinorganic chemistry expertise. Her experience binding metal complexes to proteins in graduate school still informs her work today.

Natural photosynthesis research is unique, so it requires hands-on mentoring in the lab. When asked how being a mom has impacted her mentoring style, she said, “I try to really listen, respond, and help best I can.” She prioritizes being approachable. She raised her children to be humble and kind, and she applies these values to her scientific work, too. Utschig aims to instill confidence in her mentees and push them so they can do the work.

Dr. Utschig offered advice to other women in science. She said that it’s important to remember that everybody’s different! She encourages folks to define their own path: “You can do good science and you can have three kids while you do it. You can be the mom you want to be.” Whenever making a big decision, she passes along advice her dad once offered her. “Always follow your heart and your mind. It’s gotta feel right and it’s gotta make sense.”

Winter 2022 SOTM: Esther Ngumbi, PhD

Dr. Esther Ngumbi

by J. K. Wenderott

The first thing I notice about Dr. Esther Ngumbi when she joins our Zoom room for her interview are her earrings: vibrant sunflowers. “I bought them on Etsy,” she says smiling. Dr. Ngumbi, an assistant professor of Entomology and African American Studies at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), radiates joy and excitement as we discuss her career path and passions that stem from her experiences growing up in a rural farming community along the Kenyan Coast. Describing her journey that has led her to study and research insects, ecology, food (in)security, and sustainability, Ngumbi says, “The more I learned, the more I wanted to learn. It was this treadmill that kept me going.”

Ngumbi attended Kenyatta University in Nairobi, Kenya, for her Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees of Science. She then completed her PhD in Entomology from Auburn University, becoming the first woman from her hometown to obtain a PhD degree. Describing herself as a young girl growing up in Kenya, Ngumbi says, “I could not imagine a career in science, because I did not know what science was all about.” She had role models that were teachers, doctors, and accountants, and so she originally thought she would be an accountant when she grew up. The results of her secondary school exams, though, pointed her in a different direction: “Science chose me.” Once she started to do experiments in the lab, she was hooked. “I became very, very curious… I wanted to spend more time in the lab, and I was enjoying every moment.” Ngumbi recalls some early practicals with insects in the laboratory, as well as the proximity of the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology to her University, that laid the foundation for her interests and future research in entomology. 

At UIUC, Ngumbi’s research focuses on the challenges agriculture faces to bring food to the table, brought about by stressors like climate change and insect outbreaks. How are plants defending themselves? How are plants recruiting the help they need? How can we manipulate crops to ensure they are defending themselves? These are key questions that Ngumbi is investigating. Her motivation to pursue these studies comes, in part, from formative experiences as a young girl watching farmers in her community struggle with insects and persistent drought destroying crops. These forces that led to food insecurity in her community and across the globe are ones that Ngumbi is also seeking to understand more. As an assistant professor with appointments in both Entomology and African American Studies, Ngumbi straddles the social and natural sciences. In African American Studies, she teaches classes related to food (in)security. Ngumbi feels her work in both departments influences each other, and she notes the important work of connecting her research in the lab to the impact it has on people, especially people of color in the US and across the globe.

Ngumbi stresses the critical importance of mentoring throughout her life: “I am a product of mentors who held my hand when I did not know anything about entomology and science.” These mentors range from her teachers that believed in her scientific abilities to her research supervisors that helped her see how experimental results tell a story to her current colleagues and department chair that are helping her navigate the tenure process. Having seen the impact of mentoring on her life, Ngumbi is passionate about giving back. She serves as a mentor for her graduate students and through entities like the Clinton Global University Initiative and President Barack Obama’s Young Leadership Program: “As women [in science], we are few in numbers and we cannot afford to have anyone that wants to be in science walk away because they lacked a mentor.” Ngumbi is also dedicated to being a role model that she did not have for young girls in her community and inspiring more young girls to see themselves as scientists.

When asked what advice Ngumbi would give to her younger self, she says, “Do not edit any of your aspirations and dreams… Be you and do not silence yourself.” As we wind down our interview, I cannot help but again notice the vibrant sunflower earrings as Dr. Ngumbi shares a final piece of wisdom: “Allow yourself to bloom where you are planted.” If you’d like to learn more about Ngumbi and her work, please visit https://www.estherngumbi.com/ or https://sib.illinois.edu/profile/enn.

Call for Scientist of the Month and Innovators & Motivators Volunteers!

AWIS Chicago is seeking volunteers to support the creation of their Scientist of the Month (SotM) written features and their Innovators & Motivators (I&M) podcasts for 2022. In 2022, there will be quarterly SotM features and I&M podcasts. Volunteers are welcome to support the creation of one or multiple SotMs and/or I&Ms depending on their interests and availability, and there is the option to start volunteering right away and/or later in the year. Descriptions for each opportunity are found below. University students and postdocs are especially encouraged to volunteer to gain valuable scientific communication experience! All duties will be performed virtually. If you are interested in volunteering, please reach out to us at awiscommunications@gmail.com as soon as possible to discuss the opportunities. In your email, please include your past scientific communication experience (this is not a requirement to be a volunteer), if any, and if you are specifically interested in volunteering for the SotM or I&M opportunity (or both).

SotM opportunity:

The SotM series features a person with scientific training who promotes or embodies the advancement of women in the fields of science, technology, or engineering (STEM) from the Chicagoland area. The SotM volunteer will be responsible for interviewing the feature by phone or video chat and then writing a short article (1-1.5 pages in length) that will be published on the AWIS CAC website and social media. Sample questions are provided to prepare the volunteer for the interview. It is anticipated that each feature will require ~5 hrs each to perform the interview and write and edit the feature, and the volunteer will have access to an AWIS CAC mentor throughout the process.

I&M opportunity:

The I&M podcast features a scientist who has demonstrated the ability to innovate and/or motivate in their chosen STEM career trajectory. In the podcast, the scientist is invited into this conversation with their mentee to afford for rich conversations that matter. Typically, each podcast is recorded in about 30-45 minutes, and editing is performed to bring the total podcast to around ~15-20 minutes. The I&M podcast is published on the AWIS CAC website and social media. The I&M volunteer will assist in the podcast production and editing process. It is anticipated that each podcast will require ~5 hrs each for preparation, recording, and editing, and the volunteer will have access to an AWIS CAC mentor throughout the process.

November 2021 SOTM: Toyya Pujol, PhD

By Evan Phillips

Meet Dr. Toyya Pujol, an Operations Researcher at the RAND Corporation, a self-described health data scientist, and an ardent supporter of the mission of AWIS. This summer, she served in the AWIS-Chicago area chapter’s Mentoring Circles program as a mentor for early-career level women. The two of us sat down to talk recently about her career path, and in the process, she wowed me with her sage career advice and animated spirit.

Dr. Pujol describes her career as a series of “things I fell into”, but one connective thread through it all has been “using numbers to tell a story”. As a high school student, she always loved math and physics. In fact, it was her AP Physics class that truly excited her about the world, because it used math to tell a story. She realized that while math came naturally to her, this wasn’t the case for everyone. She went on to work as a tutor for several years and completed a bachelor’s degree in Management Science with a focus in Operations Research at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

Following her time at MIT, Dr. Pujol’s interest in mathematical modeling and statistics took her to the Department of Defense (DoD) where she worked as a cost estimator for several years while also completing a master’s degree in Operations Research at Northeastern University. As an Operations Research Analyst at the DoD, she was responsible for in-depth analysis and forecasting of costs for the Air Force. Speaking about her time there, Dr. Pujol described the work as mapping programmatic information (e.g. schedules, technical requirements, logistics, etc.) to a cost distribution. In meeting rooms, she was often the only woman and person of color, as well as the youngest. However, she never felt uncomfortable in these situations. By contrast, there were incidents and a culture in academia that would come to frustrate her.

With some work experience under her belt, Dr. Pujol decided she was ready for something new and had developed an interest in healthcare. She wanted to work with “really cool” real-world data that “you can touch because it represents a person or thing” and so she embarked on her PhD in Industrial Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology (GA Tech). Starting out, she thought she wanted to work on a project to optimize radiation therapy for cancer treatment but realized this type of research wasn’t the right fit. She was still looking for that interesting story to tell with numbers. In a new lab with funding from a National Institutes of Health (NIH) Bioinformatics Training grant, she moved her focus from optimization to statistics. The new project centered around applying health analytics and machine learning to improve maternal and infant health. In the area of health data and statistics, there were real-world problems where her research could potentially impact decisions in health policy. She was awarded multiple fellowships during this time, and she credits the support from her peers and mentorship from her doctoral committee. She always felt grateful for the many female professors/advisors who set examples of how to thrive in academia.

Her Ph.D. advisor at GA Tech advocated for her and encouraged her in many ways. In fact, Dr. Pujol came to her after an incident during which a senior author on a paper repeatedly interrupted her in a meeting. This person redirected questions about the statistical aspects of Dr. Pujol’s work to a different author who was not actually involved with the statistics. Her advisor helped her see that this was something that should be reported. While this incident specifically stood out, Dr. Pujol described to me other comments and challenges in academia that “expended emotional energy”, such as people challenging your right to be “in the room” based on race or sex. She mentioned that one of the things that we don’t talk about with intersectionality is the additional stress that comes with not knowing why someone is disrespectful. You can spend hours ruminating over questions such as, “Is it your race, your sex, or does this person just not like you?”.

Toward the end of her Ph.D., she became a visiting scholar at Harvard after being connected to a biostatistics lab through one of her contacts from her undergraduate days. Her advisor at Harvard not only helped Dr. Pujol expand her research into causal inference but also helped her navigate her job search. Most importantly, Dr. Pujol credits her advisor at Harvard for setting an example of how to be successful in your career without working all the time! Indeed, Dr. Pujol loves playing volleyball, salsa dancing, and watching horror movies. She emphasized to me how she heard a lot of talk about work-life balance but there is “a complacency in academia to make changes around it”.

Right after completing her Ph.D., Dr. Pujol became an Assistant Professor of Industrial Engineering at Purdue University. Here, she was ready to embark on new data science research pertaining to healthcare. Working on multiple collaborative projects on topics such as opioid trafficking networks and telehealth, she realized she “was a policy researcher who uses engineering methods versus an engineer who does policy work.” She told me she felt “disconnected from the impact of her work” and wanted to see her work be used to help guide better health policy. Hence, several months after starting, her advisor supported her in moving toward something new. This summer, Dr. Pujol started working as an Operations Researcher at RAND Corporation, a nonprofit research organization that focuses on public policy and decision-making. In her own words, RAND is all about “choose your own adventure”, and unlike academia where you have many responsibilities set by your position (research, teaching, and service), now she has more freedom to focus on growing as a researcher while also having the option to teach courses of her design. Perhaps, most importantly though, Dr. Pujol feels much more tightly connected with policymakers, and she can focus her work on developing methods as well as making an impact. In fact, in her second week at RAND, Dr. Pujol was working again on estimating the number of opioids on the illicit market. In two weeks’ time, she gained access to DEA data, did the modeling, and could go to a policymaker with results. This is the type of work she always enjoyed and could now do in this new position. Dr. Pujol is also invested in doing thoughtful research related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and health disparities. She explained that this research area must move beyond making simplistic comparisons of two groups, showing a difference, and saying the story is over. “Race is not a cause for the discrepancy in diabetes prevalence. It’s your access to healthy food, the stress from systemic racism, socioeconomic status issues… We need to start thinking about the causal mechanisms in these outcomes… I want to put together simulations to show how we can do this analysis more thoughtfully and bring that to the community.”

Wrapping up our conversation, I was curious what her advice is for students considering graduate school: “A lot of people do it [graduate school], because they don’t know what to do! Unless you are 100% certain with NO exceptions, you want to be a Professor, I strongly suggest working before graduate school.” She stressed some key considerations for those thinking about graduate work: first, you may realize you want to do something different after starting your degree, which can influence what you study in your advanced degree; second, if you can see yourself doing anything other than a Ph.D., go do that first; third, once you’re in a graduate program, think about what “launchpad” you want to set up before graduating—like network connections and transferrable skills. Dr. Pujol’s own career trajectory involved trial and error to figure out what career would be most meaningful for her. Her advice: “Constantly update your priorities.”

September 2021 SOTM: Shivani Garg, PhD

Shivani Garg, PhD

By Evan Phillips

This month we are featuring Dr. Shivani Garg, a Senior Scientist at the local biotechnology company LanzaTech (www.lanzatech.com). Dr. Garg is a biochemist by training and a tenacious leader passionate about carbon recycling and sustainability. I had the opportunity to speak with her last month and learn about her interests.

It was during her final years of high school that Dr. Garg became enamored with biochemistry:
“I found it very interesting how we can go from very simple molecules to complicated molecules with these biochemical reactions. There was a direct analogy for me going from organic chemistry which was all catalyst-based to going to biochemistry that was biocatalyst-based. The entire world of biocatalysis, science, and enzymological reactions intrigued me a lot, and I ended up doing a PhD in biochemistry. That is how I found my passion for biochemistry. It is akin to solving a puzzle, going from molecule A to molecule X through a series of biochemical reactions.”

Having completed a Bachelor of Engineering at UIET, Panjab University, it was her blossoming interest in biochemistry that brought her to Iowa State University where she worked with Dr. Basil Nikolau. Dr. Nikolau’s management style, mentorship, and also his scientific endeavors were inspirational to her. In fact, with his support, Dr. Garg had the amazing opportunity to start her own company, OmegaChea Biorenewables LLC. The company grew out of her PhD research and time in the Iowa State Entrepreneurship Program at Center for Biorenewable Chemicals (CBiRC). Speaking of Dr. Garg as a student building a company while still doing a PhD, Dr. Nikolau said, “These start-up activities broaden her experience, make her more interesting as a scientist, and increase her motivation to succeed in research.” (https://cen.acs.org/articles/91/i43/Students-Start-Ups-Biorenewability.html?h=-1014651617). Creating bio-based lubricants from sugars was the first scientific goal of the company. After the completion of her PhD, Dr. Garg’s company extended its research to engineer E. coli that produce specialized fatty acids that could be used for this same purpose. “I worked on it for a few years. Like most start-ups, OmegaChea did not survive for long, but left me with a huge learning experience. One of the biggest learnings was that a technology may be really cool, and you may be passionate about it, but it won’t sell unless it solves a real problem or addresses a pain point of your customers. Scalability and economic viability are also critical to the success of a start-up.”

Asked about the frustrations of scientific research, Dr. Garg reinforced many students’ feelings about it: “There are more failures than successes. Sometimes we just have to walk away and return with a fresh perspective or apply a different approach.” This inevitability has never deterred her. She credits her parents for instilling a strong work ethic in her and supporting her interests. “Having gone through these experiences [graduate school and start-up company], I feel confident about tackling any problems in my professional and personal life.”

Dr. Garg expanded on her biochemistry experience next at Rice University where she engineered methane utilizing bacteria to make fuels and chemicals Here she also learned about Illinois-based LanzaTech, which has pioneered recycling of waste carbon into ethanol. This was a clear match—an innovative technology to help solve a global problem. Speaking about climate change, Dr. Garg did not mince words: “It hurts me that we now use this phrase—climate change—which used to be referred to as global warming. There was this whole politicization of the issue. We have taken more than our share from this planet than we have given back. I want to help in whatever ways I can to give back to the planet” Indeed, Dr. Garg struck me as someone who also walks the walk to promote environmental change and reduce her own carbon footprint. Specifically, she has made a conscious effort not to bring plastic into her home and to slowly take away the items that do contain plastic by finding more sustainable materials.

Since 2018, Dr. Garg has worked on engineering Clostridium bacteria at LanzaTech. Instead of relying on sugars, the novel approach is to rely on waste gases. “We’re tapping into the catalytic potential of the bacteria and the idea is to use waste gases that contain carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen. This gas mix is fed to LanzaTech’s proprietary bacteria to make fuels such as ethanol. My role is to engineer these bacteria to make a diverse range of products. These products derived via carbon recycling can replace petroleum-derived chemicals. That has a direct impact on this problem of climate change. If we can capture those emissions and reuse, recycle them we are creating a dent in the fossil carbon economy.” As remarkable as this sounded, I wondered how scalable this technology could be: “We have two commercial plants operating today in China, using industrial emissions to make ethanol and we have six other plants in various stages of design and construction globally, all using different feedstocks from steel mill process emissions to gasified agricultural resides.”  

Asked for any secrets to her career success, Dr. Garg stressed three key elements: working hard, perseverance, and patience. What is most compelling about Dr. Garg’s career though is her passion and the recognition of it: “Follow your heart.”

July 2021 SOTM: Dr. Barbara Di Eugenio

By Evan Phillips

Meet Barbara Di Eugenio, Professor of Computer Science. At the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC), Dr. Di Eugenio leads the Natural Language Processing (NLP) lab engaged in the transformative research of applying computer understanding of human language to the betterment of our world. She has been a keen supporter and member of AWIS-CAC, serving as treasurer for the chapter from 2014-17. In 2013, her work on NLP computational models and real-world applications was recognized by AWIS-CAC with the 7th Innovator of the Year award. Her PhD mentees total 13 to date, half of which have been women—almost double the national computer science average. I had the pleasure of speaking with her and learning about her academic career and passion for mentorship.

Dr. Di Eugenio had a love for mathematics growing up and wanted to find an interesting way to apply it. It was during her undergraduate years at the University of Turin when she first had the opportunity to consider whether she would pursue research as a career. She credits her academic mentors with the strong encouragement to do exactly this. However, she says it was more “happenstance” that she chose the field of NLP. By the time she was ready to pick a topic for her undergraduate thesis, it came down to either operating systems or NLP. Her criteria for selecting the topic came down to how friendly and approachable the professors she contacted were. As it turned out, she was not able to schedule an appointment with the operating systems professor. To pursue her new field further, she made her to way to Rutgers University as a Fulbright Fellow and then University of Pennsylvania for a PhD in computer science. From there, she continued teaching and doing research in Pittsburgh for five years before starting at UIC as an Assistant Professor. “In thirty years, the field has changed so much. I started working on it; I started liking it; and I kept liking it. That’s why I’m still at it now!” she said with a chuckle. In 2002, a few years after starting at UIC, she received a National Science Foundation (NSF) Career Award. This early career award advanced her research in educational applications of NLP while she dedicated herself to mentoring women scientists in computer science.

“I’m really passionate about mentoring students. This has always been my favorite part of the job and still really is. It’s really great to see someone who starts as a student and basically becomes a colleague with whom you can have intellectually stimulating discussions on topics of interest and advance the field and discuss issues. That really keeps me going. I’ve always been very keen on promoting women in science, particular in computer science.” UIC proved to be an exceptionally supportive institution for women in STEM. Dr. Di Eugenio credits another NSF grant (ADVANCE program) awarded in 2006 at UIC. This grant spurred recruitment of women faculty and postdocs and solidified a positive culture of leadership, which included a few senior women faculty members.

As with other rapidly evolving technology fields, NLP has big challenges to overcome. A major challenge, according to Di Eugenio, is the hype surrounding artificial intelligence, “I don’t buy or subscribe to the hype. I see how easily these technologies pervade society but … society is not ready or informed enough about the limitations, the dangers, and the inherent biases that can be there. At the same time, some of my areas of applications for NLP, health sciences and educational technologies, there is really an opportunity to make a difference in the lives of people.” I also asked her how she would like to contribute to the health and education sectors: “I hope I can make a difference if not directly through some result of my own then at least through pushing a viewpoint to the community.” One of her main viewpoints she is aiming to promote is to question the development of NLP into a form of black box machine learning. That is to say, she is committed to ensuring that the algorithms and training sets used for NLP are transparent and understandable so that we can feel secure about how a decision or output was generated.

I was also interested to learn what professional goals Dr. Di Eugenio has in sight beyond 2021. One is serving as a NSF program officer for a few years so that she can play a role on “the other side of the grant review process.” The second involves the interaction of NLP with social media platforms: “This past spring, I led a seminar on NLP for social media. It was enlightening, especially reading these papers that concern what social media can do wrong—hate, bullying, and so on. But also sometimes techniques to discover bias sort of reintroduce bias from a different perspective. For example, there is work on recognizing offensive language. There was a very interesting paper we looked at that tried to attribute tweets to African American or white writers. Then lo and behold, the African American tweets were considered more offensive because these techniques are not very sophisticated. If they see a certain word, they think it’s offensive but in that context in that community it might not be offensive. So, these issues are interesting and complicated. I haven’t really worked on social media research-wise and so that’s an area I would maybe like to make a contribution to going forward.”

At the end of our conversation, Dr. Di Eugenio offered some parting words of advice that should ring true for academics. “Learn to say no,” she said first. “I don’t know if it’s being a woman, or being an assistant professor, or being at the beginning of your career, but it is really hard to say no to things. But one has to be able to focus on the important things.” Second, she stressed the importance of finding a good mentor: “That is one of the things that came out from this [NSF] ADVANCE grant, a formal mentoring program at UIC in general, not just for STEM.” Finally, she gave a practical tip that I found very helpful: “I found that I have to put slots in my calendar for writing. Only then could I make progress [on a book]. Consider it a meeting time for yourself and your work. It should be some time on your schedule reserved for the important things you need to do to advance your career …. I talk about this like I have practiced it for 30 years, but I guess that is a thing one learns …. I would recommend it.”

May 2021 SOTM: Dr. Anisha Martin

Anisha Martin, MD

by Shreya Chandrasekar

Born to immigrant physician parents and raised in New Jersey, just on the outskirts of Philadelphia, Dr. Anisha Martin recognized her calling for the sciences at a very young age. After high school, Dr. Martin enrolled in the highly competitive accelerated dual degree program at Northwestern University. At Northwestern, Dr. Martin got the opportunity to explore her interests outside of the sciences and study abroad while at the same time working steadfastly towards her medical career. While she made the decision to go to medical school very early on in her life, picking a specialty was not so obvious and took her more time to determine. Remaining open to every specialty meant that she was able to explore the full potential of each one before finally picking Interventional Radiology. Dr. Martin believes that interventional radiology is the perfect fit because it encompasses her passion for procedural medicine and allows her to apply core medical knowledge gleaned from other specialties to diverse organ systems. Her pursuit of a fulfilling medical career led her to complete her residency and fellowship at very prestigious programs in the Midwest and work at high acuity settings in level 1 trauma centers. Currently, she works at UChicago Medicine Ingalls Memorial. Her present job affords her the same rigor but in a more controlled setting thus allowing her to balance the demands of motherhood, family life, and her job.

Dr. Martin’s career at the intersection of science, technology, human interaction, and intellectual problem-solving is both fulfilling and exciting, but there are also aspects of her job she finds frustrating that stem from the unique challenges of being a woman in medicine. When I asked her how she addresses the societal pressure women face of being the best at the multiple roles they play, she said, “I learned over time that you cannot be everything to everyone at every time.” Her best advice to young women is to unapologetically compartmentalize and prioritize their time (and most importantly, find outlets to unwind).

In addition to balancing motherhood, family life, and the demands of her job, Dr. Martin is pushing the envelope through her involvement in initiatives that encourage more women to seek careers in interventional radiology. Dr. Martin also aims to arm her trainees with the tools and encourages them to develop skills that enable them to navigate the uncomfortable situations that arise throughout the course of a career, for which little formal training exists – imparting wisdom on everything from contract negotiation to curbing unwelcome comments as part of her casual teaching style. A major motivation for Dr. Martin to serve as a mentor is the inspiring mentorship that she herself has received through different stages of her career. These encouraging mentors included her high school chemistry teacher, a female trauma surgeon in medical school, and a female interventional radiology attending during her residency – all of whom have modelled for her what work-life balance and fiercely following your passion looks like. By achieving her own version of work-life balance, Dr. Martin hopes to serve as a similar model for her kids and especially her daughter.

Snapshot of AWIS-Chicago Area Chapter 1978 -1988

by Marion Thurnauer,
member of AWIS-CAC since its inception and President (1987-88)

Backdrop

During the last year I came across a file containing documents pertaining to AWIS -CAC (Chicago Area Chapter).   I have been a member of AWIS-CAC since its inception.  However, the extent of my participation with the Chapter has varied over the years.  One of the so-called silver linings of our current isolation is that I have been able to re-establish some interactions with Chicago AWIS virtually, as I currently live in Boulder, Colorado. 

Here I present a selective ‘history’ of AWIS-CAC from its formation in 1978 until 1988.  The ‘history’ is selective because it reflects the material I have saved and my involvement with the Chapter.  My goal is to present the activities of the Chapter and hopefully a perspective on why   AWIS-CAC has remained relevant for forty-two years. 

First, I briefly digress.  I received my PhD in Chemistry from the University of Chicago and joined Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) as a Post-Doc in 1974.  I was promoted to a Scientific Staff position – Assistant Scientist in 1977.  Subsequently, I moved through the ‘ranks’ and currently I am retired with the title Distinguished Fellow Emeritus.  During my career (thirty years) at Argonne, I also served eight years as Director of the Chemistry Division.  I was president of AWIS-CAC, June, 1987 – December, 1988.  Following my term as president, I became involved with establishing and forwarding the Women in Science and Technology (WIST) program at ANL and committed less time to AWIS-CAC.

Inception of AWIS-CAC

My first memory of AWIS-CAC is from April, 1978 when I was invited to an informal lunchtime meeting in the cafeteria meeting room.  I believe that this was my first experience (in the four years I had been at ANL) seeing so many women scientists in one room – many more than I had imagined as I was alone as a female PhD staff in the Chemistry Division (the different ANL divisions are scattered over a large campus).  As I recall the main discussion at the meeting was whether or not to form a Chicago-area chapter of AWIS or form an ANL organization called LINK (I do not remember much about LINK, including the acronym.).  It may be that because of the potential for forming a Chicago Area Chapter of AWIS, some attendees came from outside ANL; and this would explain the perception of a relatively large group of women.

It was decided to proceed and establish the Chicago Area Chapter (CAC) of AWIS. (see attached AWIS-CAC Formed 1978.pdf article in Suburban Life Graphic, July 26, 1978).

Apparently, LINK was also formed. I believe that LINK was an activity organized and run by ANL management (perhaps the Affirmative Action Office – an archaic title that one could argue morphed into Diversity and Inclusion offices today.)  I do not know how long LINK functioned.  I mention this detail to point out an observation; the programs that endure and continue to make an impact are those that are organized and run by the stakeholders.

AWIS-CAC Activities, 1987-88

Once formed, CAC was a very active chapter, holding meetings all over the Greater Chicago area.  The number of members and activities varied over the years.  For example, during the period I was president, the membership/participation was low. Nevertheless, we (a few women, many from DuPage County) maintained the Chapter, and I am happy to see how well the Chapter is doing today.

I have copies of AWIS-CAC Newsletters from 1987 and 1988 (June/July 1987, Sept/Oct 1987, Nov/Dec 1987, Nov/Dec 1988).  They provide more than a glimpse of Chapter activities and interesting reading.  I select two newsletters and accompanying material to highlight, as I consider them to be most informative. (note the AWIS-CAC logo)

I attach a copy of the Newsletter.June.July 1987.pdf.  This Newsletter provides a detailed ‘flavor’ of AWIS activities, and includes the AWIS-CAC outgoing President’s (Betty Windom) Annual Report for 1986 and the 1986 AWIS-CAC Treasurer’s Report.  The chapter was very busy in spite of the declining membership (one can see actual membership numbers – 1983-1986 in the treasurer’s report).

I attachNewsletter Nov.Dec 1988.pdf.  In an attempt to increase membership, we mailed this Newsletter to 104 national AWIS members in the greater Chicago-land area who were not AWIS-CAC members.  We included an AWIS-CAC information/profile page and a page listing Major AWIS-CAC Activities 1981-1988 Addendum Newsletter 1988.pdf.

In a separate attachment I provide a Long List Past Activities.pdf that includes more activities than the one-page Addendum list.

One can see from the Newsletters that AWIS-CAC continued many activities regardless of the number of members. Most meetings had a speaker on topics of interest, e.g., science, education, outreach related.  I recall inviting an early career scientist to speak.  She was so appreciative to have the opportunity and experience to speak about her research regardless of the small audience. 

The Newsletters show AWIS activities included giving out awards, providing judges for local science fairs, annually presenting plaques and monetary prizes to students at the Chicago Public Schools Science Fair held at the Museum of Science and Industry, and maintaining a Speaker’s Bureau to provide speakers on request to local schools and events. 

As I read the lists of past activities, I am struck by how many of the activities are outreach activities, impacting relatively large audiences.  I was not present at the “helping her LOOK AHEAD” workshops, but it was common knowledge that they were highly successful.  When we organized the first “Science Careers in Search of Women” workshop, for college women, at Argonne in 1987 (third item on short list), the “helping her LOOK AHEAD” workshops provided a template.  The “Science Careers in Search of Women Conference” is still held annually for high school students.  Last year it was a virtual conference. 

The museum exhibit “MY DAUGHTER, THE SCIENTIST” had a relatively long run at the Museum of Science and Industry and also became a traveling exhibit.  In the September/October 1987 Newsletter, I wrote “.. we recently received a letter from a teacher in Massachusetts who learned about AWIS-CAC via advance publicity from the Museum of Science, Boston, which will be showing the exhibit MY DAUGHTER, THE SCIENTIST.” She was requesting a copy of the “Bibliography of Career Pamphlets” [see below] which also originated from AWIS-CAC.

 AWIS-CAC received a request from National AWIS to coordinate activities and plan symposia for the AAAS meeting held in Chicago in February, 1987.  This activity is described in Betty Windham’s summary (Newsletter June.July 1987.pdf).

AWIS-CAC published a 37 page Bibliography of Career Pamphlets and other useful material (1984) updated 1988 (see attached Front Page Bibliography.pdf ).  This document was very popular and available from National AWIS and AWIS CAC.  (This was the time before widespread availability of the internet and Google.)

Involvement in Congressional Task Force

The 1988 Annual Report.pdf of my tenure as President June 1987 – December 1988 is attached.  One activity summarized in my annual report, is Testimony to the Congressionally-Mandated Task Force on Women, Minorities, and the Handicapped in Science and Technology.  I also attach a copy of my Testimony MCT.pdf.  Information about the Task Force can be found in the attached Interim Report.pdf from the AWIS National Newsletter.

I was encouraged that the Task Force was mandated and held hearings in seven US cities in 1987 and 1988.  The attached Interim Report.pdf states “The role of minorities, women, and people with disabilities in science and engineering is widely seen only as an equity issue, not as the key to future national strength in science and technology.”   I recall articles and discussions during the time of the hearings, that posed the question “Who will do science in the year 2020?”  At the time students choosing science and engineering were predominantly white males.  Demographic projections showed that by 2000, white males would make-up only 25% of the US work force. 

I do not know what if any specific actions were taken in response to the Task Force Report.  However, unforeseen events, such as the breakup of the Soviet Union, in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s to some extent ameliorated the demographic issues.  Students and scientists from Eastern Europe, Russia, and Asia joined the US scientific workforce.  However, in 2021 the goals and recommendations outlined in the Interim Report have not changed.

As I was considering how to present this AWIS-CAC history, I received the following in my Email Inbox on 1/5/2021:

“The Journal of Chemical Education announces a call for papers for an upcoming special issue on diversity, equity, inclusion, and respect in chemistry education research and practice. Nationally, students exit chemistry and other science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines at rates that threaten the stability of the STEM workforce.  The departure of women and ethnic and racial minorities from many STEM disciplines can be twice as high than other student groups. This departure is preventing the nation from realizing an inclusive and resilient economy.”  (entire announcement attached: Call for Papers JChemEd)

After receiving this email, I thought, “In some ways, the AWIS-CAC Testimony MCT could be recycled today.”  Note: Words from the Testimony:  ‘Our purpose is to tell you about programs we have organized which have been designed specifically to: 1) provide career counseling to young women; 2) encourage young women to stay in science; and 3) educate the general community …’

All of this is a long way of saying: In my opinion, AWIS and AWIS-CAC has endured and remained relevant because the organizations have not strayed from their original goals and values.  (for goals and values see:  Addendum Newsletter 1988).  The AWIS-CAC activities described above are as relevant today (perhaps with some updating) as they were thirty years ago.  Many members have dedicated volunteer time to outreach activities that at the time had significant impact on a number of young women and teachers.  At the same time, AWIS served (serves) to provide networking and visibility for its members.

Thoughts about the future

The last year, 2020, brought incredible unexpected events.  We certainly did not predict all that happened during the last year from the pandemic, the Black Lives Matter protests, the election and attack on the Capitol building.  I agree with those who say we are at a pivotal point, poised to see societal change.  We cannot predict how these changes will play out, but we are witnessing much that is positive relevant to AWIS, women in STEM.  For example, women have gained visibility:  several articles have been written about the women who have made major contributions to COVID vaccine discovery and development.  See this article published in Bloomberg, for example.

Many women scientists are called upon to comment publicly on COVID-19 issues and questions.  I read that because of the pandemic, there is a surge in students applying to medical schools.  I am hopeful that we will see a similar surge in students interested in STEM fields as they are now witnessing science in real time.  

On the other hand, the pandemic has resulted in unpredicted setbacks for women.  Many are being challenged to find new ways to manage childcare and facilitate online learning.  Some are dropping out of the workforce. 

Again, as I was writing this, my weekly issue of the American Chemical Society’s ‘Chemical and Engineering News’, Jan 18/25, 2021 arrived in my Inbox.  The attached C&ENews.pdf and the link below of the same article from this issue: ‘How COVID 19 Has Changed the Culture of Science’ (the Good and the Bad and the Unknown) expresses the issues I mention above and more.  I recommend reading the article.

At the same time, we are experiencing an incredible (to me) and hopefully authentic focus on equity, inclusion, and diversity triggered by the events that led to the Black Lives Matter protests and the realization that people of color are disproportionately affected by the pandemic.  I am encouraged to read the important issue of unconscious bias was discussed in David Brooks, NYTimes Opinion Piece, January 1, 2021.  Although he was mainly referring to racial bias his comments are relevant to the gender bias, we have recognized and studied for at least twenty plus years.

Of course, I must add – 100 years after women gained the right to vote—we have elected a woman Vice President; and importantly, the news media continue to point out that Kamala Harris’s election is historic.

Bottom line:  I am cautiously optimistic that the new emphasis on diversity and equity across many fields, e.g., music, entertainment, science, etc., is authentic.  I hope this snapshot (1978-1988) of AWIS-CAC illustrates that organizations such as AWIS have laid the groundwork and continue to develop the tools to be proactive in addressing both the positive and negative issues that will be the outcome of these challenging times.